Search for: "People v. Milton"
Results 1 - 20
of 184
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Normative foundations of business may include the moral and not only economic value of promises, morally articulated fiduciary duties of agency (including duties of care, candor, and loyalty), and the obligation to show respect to all business participants, including a moral imperative to treat employees and customers as people who deserve dignity and due recognition – and not merely as means to the ends of making profits for others.[20] Adam Smith and his followers in contemporary… [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 7:28 pm
That does not suggest laissez faire in the style of Milton Friedman--it does suggest that public policy creates guard rails and expectations but does not drive micro-decision making. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in Blake & Anor v Fox [2024] EWHC 146 (KB). [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 1:10 am
On the same day, there was an anonymity application in the case of McEwen v MOD and a (without notice) injunction application in the case of HMRC v Milton. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 7:16 am
As the Supreme Court put it in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
" You don't have to be Milton Friedman to understand that supply reflects demand. [read post]
25 May 2023, 8:29 pm
That was Chief Justice Roberts channeling his inner Milton Hirsch in Tyler v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:30 pm
He reports with apparent gratification that “all across the country, people began expressly working on building incentives into legal rules” (OI, v.1, 332). [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:48 am
In National Petroleum Refiners v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:00 am
The history of price regulation was noted briefly by the Supreme Court in Munn v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 1:00 am
Milton Keynes, No Dunfermline, No, Dunfermline Abbey is a Church of Scotland Parish Church Bangor, No. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
As Milton suggested, devils ultimately inhabit “chaos” and “pandemonium. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:23 am
Schwartz, Sabastian V. [read post]
28 Jul 2022, 1:02 pm
The courts will decide whether cases like Daily Mail v Google and Texas et al. v Google show illegal monopolization of data flows, so as to fall within this special case of market power. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
To a political scientist, one way is by viewing it as a power play by the rabbinate, an attempt many centuries before the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Cooper v Aaron to engage in a performative utterance establishing themselves as the “ultimate interpreters” of the document in question, whether the Torah or the Constitution. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 1:11 pm
Milton Laines Roman (R OAO) v London Borough of Southwark (2022) EWHC 1232 (Admin) This was a judicial review of LB Southwark’s refusal to place the claimant in Band 1 of its Allocation Scheme, on the basis that the claimant’s current overcrowding in a private tenancy was a ‘deliberate act’. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
We lawyers have to keep such secrets about people as part of our jobs, but we're used to it, and we're handsomely compensated for it. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 10:00 am
Monroe’s image by others, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Milton Green Archives v. [read post]
23 May 2021, 3:24 pm
Rakusen v Jepson borne in mind. [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 3:00 am
That’s something courts have been concerned about for quite some time – for instance, here’s a quote from the 1st Circuit’s 1992 decision in Milton v. [read post]
