Search for: "People v. Minor (1994)" Results 81 - 100 of 319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2010, 7:33 am by Darren O'Donovan
They show the continuing power of majoritarian politics to make minorities visible on their own terms and to successfully drive a narrative of social control and surveillance. [read post]
25 May 2012, 5:23 pm by INFORRM
Walsh J for the majority directed that the proceedings should be heard in public, whereas Finlay CJ for the minority was prepared to accept certain restrictions in the circumstances of the case. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Anna Price
Among other stipulations, its text prohibited minors from renting, selling, or buying a video game with an AO label, with monetary penalties for people or businesses who violated these provisions. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 12:34 pm
 This could result in no postponement of limitation periods for people involved in motor vehicle accidents in which vehiclar damage occurs. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm by Morgan Weiland
J. 521 (1977). ______________, The First Amendment and the Ideal of Civic Courage: The Brandeis Opinion in Whitney v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm by streetartandlaw
Forbes, 28 F 3rd 409, 412-13 4th Cir. 1994; Rogers v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 5:49 pm by INFORRM
” Mr Justice LeBlanc, delivering judgment also considered the principles set out by the Canadian Supreme Court in Dagenais v Canadian Broadcasting Corp., [1994] 3 S.C.R. 835 and R v Mentuck, [2001] 3 S.C.R. 442 (“the Dagenais/Mentuck test”), namely that a request for a publication ban may be ordered when: (a)   such an order is necessary in order to prevent a serious risk to the proper administration of justice because reasonably alternative… [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:57 am by Peter Mahler
Apparently, the reference to FMV in § 17703.03 carried over from California’s original LLC Act adopted in 1994. [read post]