Search for: "People v. Miranda"
Results 121 - 140
of 904
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2014, 4:53 pm
People v. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 2:32 pm
People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 10:22 am
In People v Steele, the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s suppression of evidence based on the police officer’s investigatory stop of defendant’s vehicle. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 3:40 am
People v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 7:43 am
” Miranda v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 2:30 pm
People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 2:19 pm
(Pennsylvania v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 1:26 pm
At least in a case in which the defendant represents himself.I wonder if the solution here is to have an official "script" for these sort of things -- something like the Court did with Miranda warnings. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
risk of a false confession, then I can see why you'd let this stuff go on.Ultimately, here, the Court of Appeal holds that the present facts are pretty darn close to a prior case that held that the interrogation was custodial, so it was ineffective assistance of counsel not to try to exclude the confession (since there were no Miranda warnings). [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Probably the most litigated issue involving Miranda v. [read post]
26 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Probably the most litigated issue involving Miranda v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 5:13 am
"Miranda," comes from Miranda v. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 1:00 pm
(See Miranda v. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 10:45 am
Approximately two months ago, in People v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 7:22 pm
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:12 pm
In the People v Crosby the defendant with an attorney gave a confession which tarnished his chances of an acquittal. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 1:57 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 2:47 am
The Supreme Court, in J.D.B. v. [read post]
