Search for: "People v. Miranda (1993)" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 6:30 am
Ehly, 317 Or. 66, 75, 854 P.2d 421 (Oregon Supreme Court 1993). [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am by Carolina Attorneys
Moran, 509 U.S. 389, 401 n.13 (1993) (“[A] competency determination is necessary only when a court has reason to doubt the defendant’s competence. [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
"' In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 1 F.3d [87] at 93 [(2d Cir. 1993)]. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 4:46 am by Michael Lowe
  Here is when the Miranda rights must be given to the accused, which include explaining that the person has a right to keep silent and the right to have legal counsel. [read post]