Search for: "People v. Miranda (2000)" Results 21 - 40 of 74
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
A waiver of Miranda rights signed by the defendant was admitted into evidence as People's Exhibit 1. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am by Rory Little
United States (2000) and expanded by Justice Scalia in Blakely (2004), requiring that facts which increase a statutory maximum sentence must be found by a jury, not judge, and beyond reasonable doubt, not just a preponderance. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 11:07 am by Bill Otis
 It's a somewhat long story, but Justice Scalia is there at the end.As some here know, I left the Department of Justice in early 2000 because of the Department's refusal to defend in the Supreme Court its victory in the Fourth Circuit in Dickerson v. [read post]
10 Jan 2016, 7:04 pm by Danielle Wild
"(People v Santorelli, 95 NY2d 412, 420-21 [2000].)On December 31st, the Fourth Department decided two cases in which it found that the prosecutor made improper remarks in summation. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  What made this case difficult was that the Supreme Court had said repeatedly in the years that followed its decision in Miranda v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:30 am by Betty Lupinacci
” When my U.S. history class studied Miranda v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:22 am by Alison Macdonald, Matrix
On 12-13 November, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Kerr, Dyson, Hughes and Hodge) heard the case of Beghal v Director of Public Prosecutions, a challenge to the broad power of detention contained in Schedule 7 to the Terrorism Act 2000. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:18 am
Supreme Court’s June 2000 decision in Dickerson v. [read post]