Search for: "People v. Mireles" Results 1 - 20 of 22
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2013, 2:43 pm
 On IP Finance, Mike Mireles lists the details of Barack Obama's plan for patent trolls. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 2:42 am
Take a look at Mike Mireles' latest piece on IP Finance if you want the answer. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 2:29 am
The SPC Blog carries a hot-off-the-press piece from victorious law firm Powell Gilbert following judgment in Eli Lilly v Human Genome Science. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:01 am
"* The Supreme People's Court of China's Michael Jordan Trademark DecisionFormer GuestKat Mike Mireles and Kat friend Henry Liao dicuss the fresh court decision (from the Supreme People’s Court of China) on the Michael Jordan trade mark/name-personality case. [read post]
21 Jun 2016, 2:56 am
 Mike Mireles explores both sides of the coin - does the system by and large work, or does something need to be done about overly aggressive trade mark enforcement against the little guy? [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 4:29 am
IP Finance's Mike Mireles clashes with our fellow feline Neil over the worth of the World Intellectual Property Organization's (and Cornell's and INSEAD's) Global Innovation Index here. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:36 pm
They become a valued opportunity to meet people who use the same terminology and who view life through the perspective of monopolies. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 9:42 am
Keith Mallinson has been looking at the licensing of mobile technologies, highlighting some of the positive aspects of the phenomenon, while Mike Mireles writes on trade marks and homophones. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 3:10 am
 Annabelle now writes to let us know that she has put online the various videos of each presentation, for those people who could not attend the seminar. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 4:05 pm
People are forced to devise increasingly bizarre ways to express their thoughts. [read post]
19 Apr 2015, 2:13 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Since the court did not enter any factual findings, as it does when a parent consents to the jurisdiction of the court under Section 1051(a) of the Family Court Act in Article X proceedings, no adjudication on the merits took place (Mirelle F. v Renol F., 4 Misc 3d 1011(a) [Sup Ct Queens County 2004]) and there is nothing which could affect or bind the Petitioner in the future (Metz v People, 73 Misc 2d 219 [Sup Ct Nassau County 1973]; Lockwood v… [read post]