Search for: "People v. Monroe"
Results 61 - 80
of 349
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Apr 2015, 7:08 pm
The court noted that there are unusual circumstances in which silence will be admissible (People v Rothschild, 35 NY2d 355 [1974] [defendant police officer had a duty to report to his supervisors if he was taking the bribe money as part of a "sting"]; People v Savage, 50 NY2d 673 [1980] [defendant told police he shot victim during an altercation, properly cross-examined on his failure to make claim that victim was trying to rob him, as he testified at… [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 4:31 am
This comes from the Tennessee Court of Appeals in State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
That is the question considered by the the Court of Appeals in, People v Grant (_NY3d_ [10/20/11) at (see). [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 12:53 pm
Note that I say “twice” because the proposed law simply calls for “repeatedly committing acts over a period of time,” and “repeatedly” both seems to just mean “more than once,” and has been so interpreted in a closely related telephone harassment statute, see People v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 7:16 pm
People v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 7:24 am
Additional Resources: Rotting Monroe paper mill to be torn down for public park on Deerfield River, November 20, 2016, By Mary Serreze, Mass Live More Blog Entries: Rondon v. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 6:21 pm
In People v Abney and Allen (2009 NY Slip Op 07668 10/27/09) the Court of Appeals considered two cases in which the defense was denied the right to introduce expert testimony on identification evidence. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:56 am
People v. [read post]
21 Aug 2011, 10:56 am
People v. [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 11:17 pm
Then, in the 1960s, the Supreme Court awoke Section 1983 from hibernation - in Monroe v. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 1:59 pm
This post examines a recent opinion issued by the Justice Court, Town of Webster, New York, Monroe County: People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am
People v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:46 pm
Subdivision three has been held to require an actually existing weapon (People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400 [1980]). [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:26 pm
According to the Fourth Department in People v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:39 pm
From J.F. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
Monroe was leaving work after the 8 p.m. to 4 a.m. shift. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 5:39 pm
Given the widely held belief in the legal community that a GJ's decision not to indict in cases such as these is usually the result of a rigged or deliberately flawed presentation (see, People v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 2:01 pm
” As Monroe H. [read post]
