Search for: "People v. Moore"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,141
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2013, 5:54 am
V. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
Kitzhauber's December 6, 2011 reprieve, quoted in the Oregon Supreme Court's decision in Haugen v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am
The first, handed down on 21 May 2014, was R (Barkas) v North Yorkshire County Council & Anor [2014] UKSC 31; the second was R (Newhaven Port and Properties Ltd) v East Sussex County Council & Anor [2015] UKSC 7, which was handed down on 25 February 2015. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 5:01 am
Likewise, in State v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 6:33 am
More: ACLU information on ACLU v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:47 am
From Monday's decision in Webber v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm
” That constitutes a clear violation of MARPOL Annex V and is a potential felony violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships. [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 12:12 pm
An example of independence is Virginia v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 5:43 am
The decision is here: Vanguard-v-Huchon.pdf. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 8:44 pm
Revenue has historically opposed the use of 1031 exchanges, arguing that personal use and enjoyment negates the investment property requirements of section 1031.The IRS position was most recently successful in a tax court case titled "Moore v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 10:38 am
Camara v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Affirmative action disputes from Harvard and the University of North Carolina, and a partisan gerrymandering case, Moore v. [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 1:01 pm
California Appellate Districts, March 20, 2008 People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 2:46 pm
Mueck, No. 00-14092-CIV-MOORE/LYNCH, 2004 U.S. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 7:00 am
Marshall v. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 12:37 pm
Recall Yates v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 8:16 pm
Swamp People Star hunts alligators and infringers. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
Moore, 11-836, the latest iteration of the Hartman v. [read post]
5 Sep 2014, 11:29 am
People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 9:00 pm
” He was critical of Roe v. [read post]