Search for: "People v. Muhammad"
Results 1 - 20
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2007, 9:08 am
The only things worth additional, tangential, mention are these: (1) Muhammad is a former Oakland police officer, (2) Muhammad is a graduate of the U.C. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 1:01 am
On this day in history, the Supreme Court decided Cassius Marsellus Clay, Jr. also known as Muhammad Ali, Petitioner, v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 10:15 am
Muhammad and People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 5:25 am
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 12:37 pm
Under Ashe v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
The following week, Nation of Islam leader Elijah Muhammad announced that Clay would be renamed Muhammad Ali. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 10:32 am
Muhammad are just two of the thousands of people whose rights ADCRR violated. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 4:23 pm
The defendant’s Queens County Criminal Lawyer relied on the case of the People v. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:14 am
” (v 2.1)In short, you can’t have one without the other.Other prophets were anxious to call attention to God, Muhammad seemed more anxious to call attention to his own prophethood. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:38 pm
Dubbed the “D.C. snipers,” Muhammad and Malvo randomly shot and killed 12 people and badly injured six more. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 1:28 pm
It has been 17 years since John Allen Muhammad and Lee Boyd Malvo, known as the “D.C. snipers,” shot and killed 12 people and injured six more. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 5:20 am
State v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 11:51 am
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Walid Muhammad Salih Mubarak Bin ‘Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali, and Mustafa Ahmed Adam al Hawsawi. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 9:05 am
Along with it, he filed a petition for review (Muhammad v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 4:16 am
Muhammad Younis. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 4:00 am
In Bibi v. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 8:47 am
Anyone interested in participating had been able to enrol and as such the applicant could therefore not have assumed that there would only be like-minded people in the room but also people who might be offended by her statements. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 2:47 pm
Thus, primarily because of the "legal stigma" attached to warrantless and suspicionless stops, the People bear the burden of proving at a suppression hearing that the particular checkpoint in question was conducted in a non-discretionary manner, that is, the officers did not exercise individual discretion as to which cars to stop or what questions to ask akin to People v Cabrera. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
In a 4-3 decision covering a pair of cases, People v. [read post]
4 May 2015, 8:51 am
Wilkins v. [read post]
