Search for: "People v. Municipal Court (1970)"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
” In First National Bank of Boston v. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 11:19 pm
Municipal Court, 237 Cal. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 9:58 am
Dist. (1970); see also Kistler v. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 10:33 am
On August 22, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Paul Cheatham I.R.A. v. [read post]
3 Jun 2023, 6:30 am
But the language of the opinions was often much loftier, as when the Court said, in Wolff v. [read post]
23 Jul 2008, 10:23 am
As I explained last fall, in two decisions issued in the 1970s the U.S. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 8:11 am
ShareMonday’s argument in Guam v. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 9:09 am
DWI attorney Evan Levow advocates for the rights of people who are facing alleged DWI charges in New Jersey municipal courts. [read post]
13 Feb 2019, 7:00 am
In the early 1970s, New Hampshire disqualified citizens from voting in a municipality if they had a “firm intention” of leaving that town at a fixed time in the future. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 11:57 pm
" (People v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Inst. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 4:00 am
Blais v Alberta (Minister of Municipal Affairs), 2018 ABQB 71 [69] The Minister submits that it was her discretionary policy decision to make the Report available to the public, in order to ensure transparency and accountability to the people of Alberta. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 10:05 am
Romer v. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 11:43 am
Rupp v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 5:36 am
"Then there's the anti-hippie ordinance (which prohibited people from sitting in a park at Carmel-by-the-Sea), which the California Supreme Court struck down in 1971 in Parr v. [read post]
12 Apr 2016, 9:25 am
The Journey 4 Justice members were found guilty by the Topeka Municipal Court but are now appealing to the Topeka District Court, where they will get a new trial. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
The Court rejected that interpretation, reasoning that a decision based on cost and community disruption would always favor building highways through parkland, which is already municipally owned and where people do not live, such that adopting the Secretary's interpretation would make the statutory requirement close to pointless. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 4:49 am
S. 144, 167–168 (1970). [read post]
25 May 2012, 4:41 am
By Daniel RichardsonCity of Montpelier v. [read post]
