Search for: "People v. Murray"
Results 41 - 60
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2023, 5:50 am
This will be judged by reference to the well-known Murray factors: see Murray v Express Newspapers plc [2009] Ch 481 (CA) at [36]. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:55 am
Souza v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:09 am
The case before the Supreme Court, Murray v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
Bruen and Dobbs v. [read post]
12 May 2023, 5:05 pm
Bruen and Dobbs v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:30 am
In so doing, she argues (as Pauli Murray had done for the U.S.) that the most significant achievements rely on equalizing power, not equal rights. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:03 pm
I know that much time went into this release, including many hours over at least one very taxing weekend put in by Melissa Roverts Harke, Robert Holowka, Sirimal Mukerjee, Adele Kittredge Murray, Neema Nassiri-Motlagh, Jill Pritzker, David Stevens, Thomas Strumpf, Sarah ten Siethoff, and Samuel K. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:19 am
Bruen and Dobbs v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
China The Fei Chang Dao blog has an article setting out the number of people who have been punished for political religious speech in China between 1998 and 2020. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
Last week in the courts On 4 April 2023, judgement on costs was handed down by Justice Murray in the case of Parkes v Hall and Earnshaw [2023] EWHC 794 (KB). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 12:25 pm
Bruen and Dobbs v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Glenn Murray 107. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 4:39 am
” Murray v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
The Information Commissioner has lauded the judgment, saying protecting the privacy rights of “people (who) may not even be aware those rights exist” was a core function of the ICO. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
Newspaper Journalism and regulation Under new draft guidance by the College of Policing, police forces in England and Wales may soon be given the option to not release the names of people charged with offences, the Press Gazette reports. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 2:11 pm
From today's Michigan Court of Appeals decision in People v. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 1:22 am
Christina Murray (May 2015) & People v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am
PimEyes, a tool purporting to help people track their web presence, has been accused of scraping images of deceased persons to populate its database. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am
See Mapp v. [read post]
28 Feb 2023, 11:55 am
Mann, against National Review magazine, the Competitive Enterprise Institute, and Mark Steyn.[1] Back in 2014, I commented upon the oddity of a scientist’s claim of defamation against lay people for criticizing a scientist’s work.[2] Mann took umbrage to statements, critical of his work that generated a “hockey-stick” model of global temperature rises. [read post]
