Search for: "People v. Neighbours (1990)"
Results 1 - 20
of 26
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Sep 2022, 7:00 pm
The people have made their unequivocal choice.Today we will sign treaties on the accession of the Donetsk People’s Republic, Lugansk People’s Republic, Zaporozhye Region and Kherson Region to the Russian Federation. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 2:04 pm
We think there’s about 40 people there. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am
Until about 1950 the property was occupied by the dughters of Lord MacNaghten and it then passed through a period of public ownership operating as an old people's home, school, and outdoor pursuits centre before ending up in the hands of Seaport in the 1990's. [read post]
26 May 2010, 9:31 am
Until about 1950 the property was occupied by the dughters of Lord MacNaghten and it then passed through a period of public ownership operating as an old people's home, school, and outdoor pursuits centre before ending up in the hands of Seaport in the 1990's. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
The Court adopted the test of Caparo Industries Ltd v Dickman [1990] 2 A.C. 605 in establishing duty of care: Was the injury and loss reasonably foreseeable? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
The three cases that were before the Supreme Court were therefore Hounslow v Powell (a homelessness case where rent arrears had accrued, but full HB was now in payment); Leeds v Hall (an introductory tenancy case where Mr Hall had been accused of noise nuisance, threatening and intimidating behaviour and being verbally abusive towards his neighbours); and Birmingham v Frisby (another IT case, this time where Mr Frisby had been accused of noise nuisance and… [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:02 pm
The three cases that were before the Supreme Court were therefore Hounslow v Powell (a homelessness case where rent arrears had accrued, but full HB was now in payment); Leeds v Hall (an introductory tenancy case where Mr Hall had been accused of noise nuisance, threatening and intimidating behaviour and being verbally abusive towards his neighbours); and Birmingham v Frisby (another IT case, this time where Mr Frisby had been accused of noise nuisance and… [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 11:05 pm
The ‘neighbour’ principle The case of Donoghue v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:25 pm
Canada Mazhar v Farooqi 2020 ONSC 3490 – Successful anti SLAPP motion under section 137.1 of the Courts of Justice Act, R.S.O. 1990. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 11:13 pm
This was established and upheld in the case law of Bristol CC v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 10:29 am
People v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:35 pm
At issue was Thames Water’s liability for alleged odours and mosquito infestations affecting people living in properties near the Mogden Sewage Treatment Works in Middlesex. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 11:10 pm
Two people laughed, Jeremy scowled. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 9:16 am
BellSchenck v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 12:13 am
He took his learnt skills a few years later and did a series of excellent TV documentaries called “At war with next door”, teaching negotiation techniques for neighbour disputes. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
Where two people participate in an indecent act, the presence of a participant in the act does not meet the requirement of “in the presence of one or more persons” (see: R v Follet, 1994 CanLII 10217 (NLCA)). [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 8:17 am
He appeared in, among other things, the landmark Supreme Court case of National Textile Workers v. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 12:14 pm
At trial, Inco was ordered to pay the neighbours $36 million for nuisance and Rylands v. [read post]
