Search for: "People v. Newman" Results 141 - 160 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Spitzer v Newman  2018 NY Slip Op 05514  Decided on July 25, 2018  Appellate Division, Second Department is an example of the former solution. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Newman faces a $1.2m defamation suit after being accused of defaming two solicitors. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 10:11 am by Michael Risch
As Lisa predicted a couple weeks ago, the Federal Circuit issued a new en banc (11-1) opinion today in Williamson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2015, 1:13 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  In other courts, the proposition has been uniformly rejected the few times it has come up.Today a panel of the Ninth Circuit says, in essence, "of course not" in Newman v. [read post]
13 Mar 2022, 5:13 pm by INFORRM
These scams include embedded cyberattacks that “steal people’s personal data, peddle dodgy financial investments or break into bank accounts. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Second Circuit (Newman, Cabranes and Straub) is not buying this nonsense, and it suspects the DA is changing his story because it realizes that a State Court of Appeals ruling (People v. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm by Mark Ashton
  But the standard established in a 1988 Pennsylvania Supreme Court case Staudenmayer v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Davies doorstepped convicted fraudster Neelam Desai once and sent her two emails over claims she had conned people out of thousands of pounds. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am by Alan Neff
Juntilla and Newman reportedly have been dismissed from the proceeding, presumably because sanctions imposed on them by the District Court in King v. [read post]