Search for: "People v. Norred"
Results 161 - 180
of 10,601
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
The regional center and the California Department of Developmental Services (DDS), which have the responsibility for providing services for people with developmental disabilities, disagreed with the court’s adjudication and concluded that Medina did not have a developmental disability. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:09 am
” (And yet, many people in the public eye keep referencing and evangelizing the theory despite its direct and repeated role in killing people). [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:29 am
Kraft and State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 12:44 pm
Meyer (11 N.Y.2d 162), and People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:59 pm
In People v. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 12:38 pm
People v Delgado, 80 NY2d 780,783 (1992); People v Thompson, 91 AD2d 672 (2nd Dept. 1982), modified 60 NY2d 513 (1983); People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 (2nd Dept. 1982). [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 2:47 pm
However, in People v Carter ( 2012 NY Slip Op 04845 [4th Dept 6/15/2012]) neither trial nor appellate counsel failed to argue that,as a matter of law, the trial court could not lawul order that the that Mr. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 7:18 am
Doron Dorfman Braidwood v. [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 2:31 pm
That traditional approach was liberalized by the New York Court of Appeals in the cases of People v Stone (1974) and People v Sugden (1974). [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am
In Dawson v Steager, 586 U. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:00 pm
Related Cases: Center for Genetics and Society v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 4:45 pm
But I do think she knew it was "wrong" to spit at other people and to kick them in the stomach? [read post]
9 May 2019, 1:44 pm
City of Los Angeles Report of the Appellate Process Task Force Proposed Local Rules People v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 2:15 pm
King v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am
This mistaken belief is built into the Tenth Amendment, which provides that “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people. [read post]
15 May 2008, 6:07 am
Toder nor Mr. [read post]
30 Jan 2022, 1:11 pm
In the debate over whether Roe v. [read post]
9 May 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONPeople v M. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 12:08 pm
For example: "A clear bottom line: political knowledge does not correct for partisan bias in perception of 'objective' conditions, nor does it mitigate the bias. [read post]
5 May 2009, 9:00 am
In People v. [read post]
