Search for: "People v. North (1982)" Results 41 - 60 of 171
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  While not of the same scale as the Tammany Hall operation, this behavior by nineteenth century politicos was also similar to the election fraud that occurred in North Carolina in 2018 in which a Republican operative forged absentee ballots and engaged in other malfeasance in a very close congressional election.[9]  There are numerous other parallels between our current situation and that of past elections. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 1:34 pm by Patricia Hughes
Much of the law recognizing Indigenous rights over the last years, since the advent of section 35 of the Constitution Act, 1982 (“The existing aboriginal and treaty rights of the aboriginal peoples of Canada are hereby recognized and affirmed. [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm by Bill Marler
A 2019 epidemiological study has revealed that 9.2% of cattle and 18.2% of beef contain the pathogen.[2] Another recent study has estimated that the Gram-negative bacteria is present in up to 16% of North American cattle.[3] In a 2007 study by Stephens et al., Salmonella was isolated from all of the animals sampled, while Escherichia coli O157:H7 was only isolated from 42.5% of the animals.[4] Notably, 94% of oral cavity samples, 94% of hock samples, 88% of perineum samples, 86% of ventrum… [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 9:03 pm by Guest Contributor
By the time the outbreak was over, more than 700 people had been infected. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 11:22 am by Josh Fensterbush
One child, age 20 months, attended the fair on September 16 …Read More » 2015 Outbreak of E. coli O157 cluster, Red River Valley Fair-North Dakota Organism: E. coli O157:H7 Vehicle: Animal contact In July 2015 the North Dakota Department of Health investigated an outbreak of E. coli O157 in persons who attended the Red River Valley Fair held in West Fargo, North Dakota. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 3:53 pm by Mark Walsh
” the chief justice says to a courtroom of people, most of whom are not judges. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 6:09 am
She has requested an explanation for the unauthorized use and how the communities in which these cultural expressions were created will benefit.In the letter, certain pieces from the fashion collection are designated as infringing specific Mexican cultural rights, such as garments 8 and 23, whose embroidery is typical of the community of Tenango de Doria; garments 11 and 13, embroideries from the Isthmus of Tehuantepec; and garments 14 and 16, which incorporate the “sarape del… [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4]  The E. coli bacterium is among the most… [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 7:36 am
America’s Communal Utopias (University of North Carolina Press, 1997). [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 5:06 pm by Michel-Adrien
Sparrow, the Supreme Court of Canada considered for the first time the scope of section 35(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, which recognizes and affirms the Aboriginal and treaty rights of the Indigenous peoples of Canada. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
… Major Philosophers rarely or never cited Heraclitus, Parmenides, Empedocles, Anaxagoras, Protagoras, Epicurus, Zeno of Citium, Plotinus, Epictetus, Gregory the Great, John the Scot, Avicenna, Averroes, Roger Bacon, John Calvin, Baruch Spinoza, George Berkeley, Henri Bergson, Alfred North Whitehead and Søren Kierkegaard, all named in that earlier list of major philosophers, fill that bill. [read post]
30 Apr 2018, 2:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
" But the First Amendment protects people's right to speak about others, including using others' images and "information about" them. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
  One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]