Search for: "People v. Novel" Results 41 - 60 of 2,088
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2022, 9:16 am by Eric Goldman
Ancestry Section 230 Doesn’t Protect Advertising “Background Reports” on People–Lukis v. [read post]
10 Oct 2006, 5:16 am
I find myself defending something that I find repugnant, but I feel it needs to be provided.Fun Home is the first graphic novel published by Houghton Mifflin. -- Board of Education v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 9:56 pm
With respect to the merits of defendant's contention that a Frye hearing was required, it is well settled that expert testimony concerning CSAAS is admissible to assist the jury in understanding the unusual conduct of victims of child sexual abuse provided that, as here, the testimony is general in nature and does "not attempt to impermissibly prove that the charged crimes occurred" (People v Carroll, 95 NY2d 375, 387; see People v Gillard, 7 AD3d… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:06 am by admin
Both the novel and movie meant something to people and in many respects, it changed lives. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 6:26 pm by Charles Bieneman
  This is an important statement because many people, such as the majority of the Federal Circuit panel in MySpace, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 12:53 pm by Bruce Carton
The use of photos to illustrate points probably does not seem all that novel to most people, but it is still rare enough in the legal world that it causes double-takes. [read post]