Search for: "People v. Novo" Results 1 - 20 of 541
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
As a committed socialist, Egilman was incurious about how and why occupational and environmental diseases were so prevalent in socialist and communist countries, where profits are outlawed and the people own the means of production.[2] Like the radical labor historians David Rosner and Gerald Markowitz, Egilman tried to cram the history of silicosis (and even silicosis litigation) into a Marxist narrative of class conflict, economic reductionism, and capitalist greed. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 7:53 am by Guest Contributor
Circuit is considering direct challenges to the Good Neighbor Rule (Utah v. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am by INFORRM
One company sent more than 415,000 text messages without valid consent, encouraging people to get “free advice”, whilst another made unsolicited calls about pensions. [read post]
28 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Even where there is a statutory right of appeal – which, under Vavilov, leads to de novo review – a court might legitimately adopt the decision-maker’s interpretation as its own. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 1:29 am by CMS
Of most significance to these appeals is the Court of Appeal decision in Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194) (‘Novo’) Taylor v A Novo (UK) Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 194 (18 March 2013) (bailii.org). [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 7:59 pm by Kurt R. Karst
By Philip Won & Véronique Li, Senior Medical Device Regulation Expert —“Total Product Life Cycle Advisory Program or TAP pilot — the most exciting thing in MDUFA V. [read post]