Search for: "People v. Novo"
Results 161 - 180
of 544
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Why this is working in this way is perfectly summed up in this decision out of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Curtis v. [read post]
4 Jun 2020, 6:36 am
They cited the Supreme Court’s decision in Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 1:52 pm
We review de novo whether a sentence constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 12:38 pm
We review the court's legal conclusions de novo, as well as its treatment of mixed questions of law and fact; we review its factual findings for clear error. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 8:08 am
The travel ban case, Trump v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
Merpel tells all.* When the business is over: an IP enthusiast's thoughts from San FranciscoIP conferencing may be hard, and even harder it would be without people (i) who actually attend certain events and (ii) who have enough energy to reflect and draft a report on the conference. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 9:17 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 3:14 am
Craig & Bishop, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 6:20 pm
Gundy talked about people being stewards of the earth, local pollution, slavery, neglect since consolidation and violence, among other topics. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 8:12 am
There are two types of people in D.C.: those who can’t handle a little bit of snow; and those who enjoy ridiculing them. [read post]
24 Aug 2016, 12:11 pm
Ass’n v. [read post]
5 Oct 2016, 6:36 am
The court began its analysis of his arguments by noting that[w]e review the judge's legal conclusions de novo and factual findings for clear error. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 5:01 am
(Compare People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2013, 5:10 am
Dean v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 1:30 pm
United States 14-456Issue: Whether, when a court of appeals issues a general remand for resentencing, the district court may conduct resentencing de novo. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 11:35 am
State v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 5:06 am
That means we review the military judge's findings of fact for clear error but her conclusions of law de novo. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 12:13 pm
People, 389 P.3d 100, 108 (Colo. 2017) (`[T]he presence of photos in the internet cache alone does not automatically establish knowing possession. [read post]
