Search for: "People v. Odom"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2023, 11:02 am
It also fulfills an urgent need, as Louisiana law bars civil rights challenges after one year following the incident, and the Supreme Court case Heck v. [read post]
6 Nov 2022, 3:23 am
Here is the opinion: Green v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 10:30 am
Odom debunked a new Chinese talking point about U.S. policy in the South China Sea. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 12:40 pm
” “Most academic connections are developed along the lines of narrowly defined intellectual interests,” said James V. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 11:18 am
Foreign Minister Wang Yi suggested that the Philippines v. [read post]
27 Jan 2016, 11:39 am
Murder over a Play Station.Second, the defendant's name is Ryan Odom. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Cutter Laboratories, 53 F.3d 1184, 1192-93 (11th Cir. 1995) (applying Florida law); Odom v. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 6:01 pm
People say the darnedest things at work. [read post]
21 Oct 2013, 5:30 am
Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:11 pm
It is for this reason and to make sure we preserve the right to appeal any outcome that we have hired Tom Odom at the Firearms Industry Consulting Group. [read post]
7 Sep 2013, 4:09 pm
The People argue that this case is governed by C.P.L § 400.15 (7)(b), which provides that a defendant who fails to challenge the prior felony at the time of his sentencing waives the issue akin to People v Alvarado and People v Odom. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 12:36 pm
Odom (but leaving in place the murder conviction). [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:19 am
" In Clea v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:30 pm
In Odom v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
A fifth indictment, United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 5:35 pm
The Michigan Supreme Court denied eight applications for leave to appeal, including: Odom v City of Detroit, No. 142483, where Justices Marilyn Kelly and Hathaway would grant leave; People v Taylor, No. 142390, where Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant leave; People v Kerr, No. 142257, where Justice Marilyn Kelly would grant leave and Justice Zahra did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel; and Spayth… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Nail v. [read post]
