Search for: "People v. Olivo" Results 1 - 17 of 17
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2013, 12:15 pm
Where asportation of merchandise is involved, the item(s) 'need not be completely removed from the premises as long as there has been some physical movement and an exercise of dominion and control that it inconsistent with the owner's rights' (People v Jensen, 86 NY2d 248, 255 [Titone, J. dissenting] citing Olivo, 52 NY2d 309), factors which were established prima facie in the information filed herein by the People." [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
Also called Petit Larceny and often referred to as PL 155.25, THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 3:01 am by Jeremy Saland
A lesser standard when compared to a trial’s beyond a reasonable doubt, the court stated that: “Given the sheer number of t-shirts allegedly concealed by defendant, the store employee’s sworn allegations were sufficient for pleading purposes to satisfy the intent and asportation elements of the charged offense, and this even in the absence of specific allegations as to the defendant’s movements or whereabouts in the store (see generally People v… [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 11:52 am
Supreme Court announced that it would hear Baze v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Kelly said, "It's one thing when people sell their blood for money; it's another when they sell their drugs, especially when the diversion compromises the pharmaceutical supply with tainted and outdated drugs. [read post]