Search for: "People v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co." Results 1 - 20 of 35
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm by Guest Author
 In doing so, it embraces Supreme Court cases like Tornillo, which involved a state law that compelled newspapers to run partisan editorials, and similar precedents like Pacific Gas & Electric and Hurley. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Richard Zelichov and Trevor T. Garmey
Securities Litigation, 768 F.3d 1046 (9th Cir. 2014) (violations of Section 303 do not give rise to private right of action under Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5) with Stratte-McClure v. [read post]
10 Jul 2021, 12:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
"[174] But the Court was unmoved by this concern, and instead noted the university's ability to respond (whether or not it would have "prefer[red] to remain silent") as a basis for upholding the hosting requirement.[175] (While the plurality in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
An example of this can be found in Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Casey[17] held that the government can require doctors who perform abortions to "inform the woman of the nature of the procedure, the health risks of the abortion and of childbirth, and the 'probable gestational age of the unborn child.'"[18] The plurality in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 7:12 pm by Eugene Volokh
Casey[17] held that the government can require doctors who perform abortions to "inform the woman of the nature of the procedure, the health risks of the abortion and of childbirth, and the 'probable gestational age of the unborn child.'"[18] The plurality in Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 2:26 pm
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. (1998) 61 Cal.App.4th 1480, 1488, fn. 3 [contention was deemed waived because "[a]ppellant did not formulate a coherent legal argument nor did she cite any supporting authority"].) [read post]