Search for: "People v. Page"
Results 241 - 260
of 9,249
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2020, 12:16 pm
Those are not trivial costs either.So the real questions are (1) what the Constitution requires (not what the statute says), (2) what's the best policy, for the individual and/or the state, and (3) which procedure is most efficient; a system that routinely enters mandatory orders that few people will ever pay and that burdens people and the system with their enforcement, or a system that takes into account ability to pay but requires hearings for those defendants… [read post]
27 May 2010, 2:50 pm
The Snyder v. [read post]
4 Feb 2008, 1:16 pm
Justice Kennard's opinion on this point is pretty short (five double-spaced pages) and worth a quick read. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 4:40 pm
Check out page 4. [read post]
11 May 2008, 4:32 pm
Blogger's note: Loving v. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 8:35 am
Are there new people to be determined in this story? [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 12:04 pm
It's fairly short, at 14 double-spaced pages, and yet despite its brevity, is incredibly comprehensive. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 2:11 pm
(People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:27 am
Supreme Court announced its decision today in McDonald v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 9:59 am
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Dex Media West, Inc. v. [read post]
17 May 2018, 12:37 pm
" Court orders addressed to third parties (chiefly in libel cases): Here too Google generally has no legal obligation to deindex material—if you sue me for libel and get an injunction finding that my page libeled you and that I must remove it, that generally doesn't bind Google (though the Hassell v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:48 am
As a followup on the interrelationship of KSR v. [read post]
5 Feb 2020, 1:10 pm
Justice Humes does a great job (on pages 20 to 21 of the opinion) of showing the background of that text in the context of the ongoing "text-fighting" between Wear and his girlfriend. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:08 am
People v. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Warning: some of the links here - or links from linked pages - may take you to pages with adult content. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 10:36 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 4:44 pm
The decision in Unabhängiges Landeszentrum für Datenschutz Schleswig-Holstein v Wirtschaftsakademie Schleswig-Holstein GmbH (C-210/16) is likely to have significant implications for Facebook and for those who are using social media sites for certain purposes that go beyond merely personal ones. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 2:54 am
Judge Reinhardt wrote a 133 page dissent. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:12 pm
Prior to opening statements, he told the court he was going to introduce various pages from the Bible, and that these were relevant because:"What I have to do here is I have to demonstrate that there's something else going on in this world that people are aware of. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:18 pm
Jacobson of Strasburger & Price, LLP, Washington, D.C. had, for example, a recent posting on "Heritage Foundation Hosts Program on Dual-Use Export Controls With China".Internet Cases points to an important case of first impression involving criminal harassment and MySpace (People v. [read post]
