Search for: "People v. Page (1991)" Results 161 - 180 of 310
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
  To my surprise, although a few people had written about it, see, e.g., Kenneth Duval, Burdens of Proof and Qualified Immunity, 37 S. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:10 am by New Books Script
K 561 B73 2012 Brandeis Meets Gutenberg : German-American Conversations on Law, 1991-2011 Dieter Do? [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 11:11 am by Jeh Johnson
And the discussion of war powers—which generally occurs only among national security lawyers and professors, Lawfare, Charlie Savage, and a small number of members of Congress—was thrust back on to the front pages. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
id=62ac2fc048370f4c2c31b714 ALLEGEDLY INFRINGING URLS: https://conlinpa.com/2016/04/03/hyman-v-daoud/ As you might gather, you can't stop people from writing about you by registering your name as a trademark. [* * *] Here's that post from last week: I wrote about Hyman v. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 7:16 am by Ronald Collins
Ginsburg makes an important and timely point about a friendship many have remarked on with surprise: “If our friendship encourages others,” she stresses in her foreword, “to appreciate that some very good people have ideas with which we disagree, and that, despite differences, people of goodwill can pull together for the wellbeing of the institution we serve and our country, I will be overjoyed, as I am confident Justice Scalia would be. [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 3:52 am by INFORRM
As Eady J put the matter in Mosley v News Group Newspapers Ltd: ‘Once the cat is out of the bag, and the intrusive publication has occurred, most people would think there was little to gain. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 11:05 am by lawmrh
Permit State Bar members the option of paying only such portions of the dues which are to be used for the permissible purpose of regulating the legal profession or improving the quality of legal services available to the people of the State of New Mexico, see Keller v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 7:36 am
"Stare decisis is not an inexorable command," he said in a 1991 opinion that included, in a page and a half of small type, a list of 33 precedents that the court had overturned in the previous 20 years. [read post]