Search for: "People v. Parodi"
Results 81 - 100
of 575
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2021, 9:25 am
” The 54 page guide is, at times, worthy of a MAD magazine parody, but the document quickly transcends parody to take us into an Orwellian nightmare of thought-control in the name of neo-Marxist “social justice” goals.[4] In its guide to language best practices, the AMA urges us to promote health equity by adding progressive political language to what were once simple statements of fact. [read post]
7 Oct 2021, 11:30 am
From U.S. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Prior attempts to measure tarnishment: Buccafusco et al 2016 focused on porn parodies, found burnishing except among very conservative consumers. [read post]
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am
Epic released a software update for Apple iOS devices on 13 August 2020 making the Fortnite’s virtual currency (called V-Bucks) available for purchase through its own website, in addition to Apple’s App Store, at a 20 per cent discount. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 10:00 am
Monroe’s image by others, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals in Milton Green Archives v. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
It appears that at least 32.5% of people will proclaim “TEFAL! [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 7:06 am
See Cairns v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:20 am
Image: Elizabeth PhungIn chapter 16 Bill Patry provides an absolutely delightful comparative analysis of humour in US law and parody in the EU, describing his chapter as discussing:the frustrations that people who are funny have with legislators and judges who are not. [read post]
17 May 2021, 3:57 pm
The Supreme Court’s seminal fair use decision, Campbell v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 9:34 pm
It's like a parody, but for real. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:39 am
People whom I suspected to be Qualcomm employees even created a "Mlorian Fueller" parody account with an Apple logo as a picture during the 2019 FTC v. [read post]
4 May 2021, 10:04 am
See State v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 7:43 am
It was a way of evading censorship and slyly saying what they thought about other aspects of Chinese culture, including success v. slavery. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 9:52 am
Most people see the negotiations as an implicit concession that the material is protected by copyright (or by some other type of intellectual property). [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 12:05 pm
H.S. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 10:29 am
Parody exceptions could also be seen through 10(1) and not just three step test: lets us worry less about definitional distinctions among parody, satire, pastiche, though that might be relevant to fair practice rather to whether exception kicks in at all. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 3:34 pm
Of course not, and that’s why EFF filed an amicus brief in Lafayette City v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 5:01 am
Falwell, 485 U.S. 46, 55-56, 108 S.Ct. 876, 99 L.Ed.2d 41 (1988) (holding that a public figure cannot sue for intentional infliction of emotional distress resulting from a parody because the parody is protected speech). [read post]
25 Dec 2020, 12:30 pm
Seuss: "The creators thought their Star Trek primer would be 'pretty well protected by parody,' but acknowledged that 'people in black robes' may disagree. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 5:01 am
” To be constitutionally valid, a limitation on freedom of expression has to be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society following the four-step test from R v. [read post]
