Search for: "People v. Parodi"
Results 101 - 120
of 575
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2018, 7:53 am
Acosta v. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 7:04 am
” See Campbell v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 5:14 am
Hart v. [read post]
2 Aug 2019, 3:42 am
The first one, authored by Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge), discusses two decisions, one of which is the passing off case Johnston v Archibald Orr Ewing & Co (1882). [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 12:51 pm
Charles Colman, Trademark Law and the Prickly Ambivalence of Post-Parodies: The way that people play with trademarks that companies have deliberately infused with atmospherics, per Jessica Litman, and to which people have predictable emotional responses. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 9:00 pm
In Bourne Co. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 10:42 am
Or was it a parody, I forget. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 5:16 am
[In the earlier Levitt v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 12:03 pm
Campbell said it wouldn’t judge whether the parody was good, just whether it was a parody. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:20 am
Campbell v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:27 pm
As such, many gamers bought Plants v. [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 1:03 pm
Dworkin Creating Parody Social Media Accounts Doesn’t Violate Computer Fraud & Abuse Act – Matot v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 8:56 am
* Albert v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 6:08 am
Equally importantly, a parody that's legal in, say, France, must also be legal in Germany and Greece and Spain. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 1:45 am
Bake Off parody goes off-airThe Sound of Music has now been silenced, as copyright owners object to BBC's marketing parody. [read post]
24 May 2010, 2:20 pm
See NAACP v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 5:33 am
The defendant raised the defences of freedom of artistic expression, as well as parody, both of which were however rejected by the court.Eleonora also provided us with A Kat's 2019 Copyright Awards, which included the most important copyright decision, copyright person of the year, and the most important policy issue for 2020 (no spoilers here - go read it for yourself!) [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:40 pm
An imputation will be considered defamatory if it exposed the plaintiff to hate, contempt or ridicule (see Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press (1991) 23 NSW LR 443); tended to make the plaintiff shunned or avoided (Morgan v Lingen (1863) 8 LT 800); tended to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of others (Sim v Stretch (1936) 52 TLR 669). [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
” That clearly was not enough for the distillery, which argued that people would be confused by the parody. [read post]
