Search for: "People v. Paul" Results 201 - 220 of 3,502
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2011, 12:13 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Adler) The WSJ’s Jess Bravin reports on an interview with recently retired Justice John Paul Stevens in which he defended his “most unpopular opinion” — Kelo v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 10:41 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) An interesting National Law Journal op-ed from Clark Neily and Paul Sherman of the Institute for Justice, about a case of theirs, Locke v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 12:41 pm by Donald Thompson
We should respond that these questions address the ability of a potential juror to be fair and impartial, an area of inquiry in which a trial court is more apt to commit error (see CPL § 270.20[1][b]; People v Arnold, 96 NY2d 358 [2001]; People v Johnson, 94 NY2d 600 [2000]; People v Lewis, 71 AD3d 1582 [4th Dept 2010]; People v Habte, 35 AD3d 1199 [4th  Dept 2006]). [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 5:48 am
Contents include:Natalie Alkiviadou, Freedom of religion: lifting the veils of power and prejudice Paul Chaney, India at the crossroads? [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
Denial of Correction Officer’s Performance of Duty Retirement Benefits Annulled Due to Factual Errors - Matter of Paul Mazzotte v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller Petitioner was a correction officer for over 20 years. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:19 am by Public Employment Law Press
Denial of Correction Officer’s Performance of Duty Retirement Benefits Annulled Due to Factual Errors - Matter of Paul Mazzotte v Thomas DiNapoli, as State Comptroller Petitioner was a correction officer for over 20 years. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 12:30 pm by Orin Kerr
Both approaches are rooted in the unique history of the American people. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:02 pm by Paul Smith
Paul Smith is the vice president of Litigation and Strategy at the Campaign Legal Center. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am by Frank Cranmer
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:32 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: At Reason.com, Damon Root responds to the argument by retired Justice John Paul Stevens, made in his new book, that the Second Amendment should be rewritten to provide that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm by Frank Pasquale
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Several people have told me that I managed to make a dry and complicated subject understandable and even entertaining, which I take as the highest compliment. [read post]