Search for: "People v. Paul" Results 141 - 160 of 3,492
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2016, 7:00 am by Legal Talk Network
Paul was also the principal investigator for defense counsel in U.S. v Schweder, the first federal evidentiary since 1973 hearing to challenge the constitutionality of cannabis as a schedule I controlled substance. [read post]
20 May 2010, 3:43 pm by Big Tent Democrat
It would be one of those "persuasion" moments people seem to like to talk about. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:24 pm
Fry, Towards an International Piracy Tribunal: Curing the Legal Limbo of Captured Pirates Rhuks Temitope Ako & Olubayo Oluduro, Identifying Beneficiaries of the UN Indigenous Peoples’ Partnership (UNIPP): The Case for the Indigenes of Nigeria's Delta Region Moses Retselisitsoe Phooko, Legal Status of International Law in South Africa's Municipal Law: Government of the Republic of Zimbabwe v Fick and Others (657/11) [2012] ZASCA 122 Konstantinos D. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
There are three reasons why I think the case of Sir Cliff Richard v BBC is wrongly decided. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 10:17 pm
Further, the prosecutor improperly elicited testimony establishing that defendant had been incarcerated since his arrest (see People v Paul, 229 AD2d 932, 933), as well as testimony on direct examination of the confidential informant that defendant had not made certain exculpatory statements to him while they were in jail following defendant's arrest (see generally People v Collins, 12 AD3d 33, 38-39).It cannot be said that County Court "took… [read post]
27 Jul 2012, 9:49 am by Isabel McArdle
Paul Chambers v DPP [2012] EWHC 2157 - Read judgment The famous ‘Twitter joke’ conviction of Paul Chambers has been overturned on appeal, bringing welcome clarity to what is and what is not an offence of this type. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 1:10 pm
(Court Reporter Paul McManus, OCR.)THIS IS A TEXT ONLY ENTRY. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 pm
Update V: This issue made it onto conservative commentator Tucker Carlson's MSNBC show. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 5:59 am by Paul Adam
 The Ontario Courts have already found, for instance in the case of RA1 & RA2 v JM et al (Superior Court, 2013) that a so-called "bystander parent" can be liable for failing to protect a child. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:06 am by John Inazu
  In the proceedings leading up to Roberts v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 4:42 am by Amy Howe
Briefly: In an excerpt from his new book, reprinted in The Washington Post, retired Justice John Paul Stevens discusses the Second Amendment and proposes an addition to the amendment which would provide that “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms when serving in the Militia shall not be infringed. [read post]