Search for: "People v. Paul"
Results 161 - 180
of 3,503
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2023, 9:51 pm
In my last post, I outlined some things I hoped to learn from Justice John Paul Stevens' papers about Kelo v. [read post]
3 May 2023, 11:49 am
Justice John Paul Stevens. [read post]
3 May 2023, 5:36 am
In 2015 in Michigan v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 9:01 pm
Wade in Dobbs v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am
Review of the ecclesiastical court judgments during April 2023 Eleven consistory court judgments were circulated in April concerning: Reordering, extensions and other building works CCVT Exhumation Churchyards and burials Organs This summary also includes CDM Decisions and Safeguarding, Reports from the Independent Reviewer, Privy Council Business, Visitations, and CFCE Determinations, as well as links to other posts relating to ecclesiastical law. [read post]
1 May 2023, 5:51 am
District Court Hearing in Cawthorne v. [read post]
29 Apr 2023, 6:00 am
In Harper v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 5:46 am
Paul that even within a category of "unprotected" speech, the First Amendment still forbids certain kinds of censorship. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 7:07 am
v=VaSTb5kNT4s 7. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 2:40 am
China The Fei Chang Dao blog has an article setting out the number of people who have been punished for political religious speech in China between 1998 and 2020. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 1:48 pm
From Judge Paul Maloney's opinion Friday in Al Qassimi Academy v. [read post]
18 Apr 2023, 5:48 am
In a previous post, I described the political landscape for this year’s Section 702 reauthorization debate and noted the view of most observers that Section 702 is unlikely to be reauthorized this year without significant reforms. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Revd Paul Williamson in court again In July 1997, the Revd Paul Williamson was made the subject of a Civil Proceedings Order as a vexatious litigant pursuant to s.42(1A) Senior Courts Act 1981 (Restriction of vexatious legal proceedings), primarily as a result of a series of proceedings arising from his opposition to the ordination of women: see R v HM Attorney-General ex parte Reverend Paul Stewart Williamson [1997] EWHC Admin 691. [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
To take one example: many people have tried to explain to me how holding companies work, but Mark, at page 970, is the only person who has succeeded. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm
Given the food, the library's beauty, and the fact that the mantra in my heaven is that reasonable people can disagree, these discussions are usually very cheerful. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:45 am
Father Paul Knapp 67. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 12:57 pm
Brandon Beck, Judge Higginson and the Role of the Solicitor General in United States v. [read post]
6 Apr 2023, 5:01 am
I'm glad to say that, in yesterday's Cerame v. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 2:22 am
The Information Commissioner has lauded the judgment, saying protecting the privacy rights of “people (who) may not even be aware those rights exist” was a core function of the ICO. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
” Twenty years later, Alice Paul rewrote the ERA to better reflect the language in the Fifteenth and Nineteenth Amendments. [read post]
