Search for: "People v. Peacock"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2009, 9:00 am
In People v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:49 pm
Peacock's contention that the trial court erroneously permitted two witnesses to bolster the identification testimony of the complainant (People v Peacock,70 AD2d 781 [4th Dept 1979]), but held that "in light of the strong evidence of guilt, including defendant's confession, we find the error to be harmless. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:53 pm
Societe Nautique de Geneve
Subscription Required
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal Practice
Presence in Store Below Apartment Where Drug Paraphernalia Found Insufficient to Show Dominion
People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:37 pm
Peacock's contention that the trial court erroneously permitted two witnesses to bolster the identification testimony of the complainant (People v Peacock,70 AD2d 781 [4th Dept 1979]), but held that "in light of the strong evidence of guilt, including defendant's confession, we find the error to be harmless. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 11:22 am
It is of note that Mr Peacock’s interpretation of the applicable test would have undesirable consequences in practice. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:14 am
STATE V. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 2:00 pm
This was outlined in the precedential 1925 Florida Supreme Court case of Peacock v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:17 pm
Burr v. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 12:17 pm
Burr v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
Yet, in People v Walker (4th Dept 9/30/11)) the Court held that a trial courtdid not err in refusing defendant’s request to allow defendant to present the testimony of a false confessions expert. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 2:24 pm
Yet, in People v Walker (4th Dept 9/30/11)) the Court held that a trial courtdid not err in refusing defendant’s request to allow defendant to present the testimony of a false confessions expert. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 6:53 am
It seems incredible for so many reasons that I first published the reprinted post below over a year ago...The Dual Critical Role and Culpability of the Media in State v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:55 am
Counsel for SSE were Jonathan Peacock KC and Michael Ripley. [read post]
19 Dec 2015, 9:57 am
She feels particularly vulnerable to most people being men late at night, often under the influence of alcohol. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 1:21 pm
In consequence, Ms I left the flat and went to saty with the only people she knew, a friend and his wife in London. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 9:35 am
Yesterday, Ed Brayton commented in "How Many Innocent People Are In Prison? [read post]
29 Aug 2014, 6:29 am
State v. [read post]
15 Jan 2012, 4:06 pm
On the Centre for Law, Justice and Journalism blog, Alex Antoniou analyses the recent decision in R v Peacock. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 4:56 am
Proud as peacocks, they are. [read post]
