Search for: "People v. Peoples"
Results 41 - 60
of 72,054
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2015, 10:33 pm
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The Supreme Court ruled in Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 1:43 pm
The Supreme Court decided today by a 5-4 vote in the D.C. v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 12:45 pm
The People win. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:50 pm
After an eight-day trial in the Circuit Court for Howard County, a jury found Peoples guilty of attempted murder in the ... [read post]
25 May 2018, 9:30 am
Amy: Back in 1994, we represented Dee Farmer in front of the Supreme Court (Farmer v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 12:58 pm
Last week, the California Appellate Court in a lengthy opinion (116 pages) overturned the murder conviction of Michael Pizarro (People v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:29 pm
The will (People's exh. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 6:19 am
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 3:48 pm
Dueñas" -- which is ironic, as the opinion (which is actually People v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:17 pm
In People v. [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 12:26 pm
In the first, People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
The Court of Appeal opinion is People v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:33 pm
The court may also consider "reliable hearsay," including the case summary prepared by the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders (People v Hucks, 72 A.D.3d 1608, 1609, lv denied 15 N.Y.3d 706; see People v Cunning . . [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 2:32 pm
People v. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 2:29 pm
The law does not require the same degree of proof to hold a defendant for action of the Grand Jury as is demanded for conviction; however, the proof must be sufficient on its face to sustain conviction of the defendant akin to People v Eckert and People v Donahue. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 12:45 pm
People v. [read post]
1 May 2018, 8:28 pm
2018 NY Slip Op 02797 April 25, 2018 Decision Continue reading [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 11:00 am
"We conclude under People v. [read post]
9 Apr 2023, 3:53 pm
But it appears that People v. [read post]
