Search for: "People v. Perez (1970)" Results 1 - 16 of 16
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am by Larry Catá Backer
McClung, 379 U.S. 274 (1964) (Commerce power extended to application of anti-discrimination statute to a local restaurant that served almost purely local customers where its food was ordered in interstate commerce); Perez v. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Joseph Landau
In 1958, for example, the Supreme Court in Perez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]