Search for: "People v. Perez (1981)" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am by Unknown
(Race Discrimination; Section 1981; Peyote) Conway v. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:44 pm by Donna
Age discrimination statute prohibits retaliation: The same day in 2008, the Court in Gomez-Perez v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
25 May 2012, 12:05 am by Ken
Sarmiento-Perez, 724 F.2d 898, 900 (11th Cir. 1984). [read post]
25 Oct 2013, 8:47 am by Joy Waltemath
After she was fired, the employee filed suit for discrimination and retaliation under Sec. 1981 and the NJLAD. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:21 am by Vercammen Law
He alleged that decedent lacked testamentary capacity to execute the will and that Olga exercised undue influence over decedent to 1 Because several people involved in this matter share last names, we refer to them by their first names. [read post]
24 May 2023, 6:37 am by Paula Junghans
DA Office: “[T]he People further refer defendant to certain facts, among others, set forth in the Statement of Facts relating to … disguising reimbursement payments by doubling them and falsely characterizing them as income for tax reasons Court filing in response to defendant’s request for bill of particulars. [read post]