Search for: "People v. Perez (1998)"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Oct 2014, 12:38 pm
Illinois Post-Conviction Relief and People v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 10:48 am
See, e.g., People v. [read post]
29 Sep 2023, 6:36 am
He began his career in the California State Assembly in 1994, earning the role of Speaker of the Assembly in 1998. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 4:30 am
O’Connor, Francis V., ed. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:20 pm
People v. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 6:48 am
This post examines an opinion from the Appellate Court of Illinois – Fifth Division: People v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Indeed, respondents essentially concede that if an entity is a "public body" for purposes of the OML, it is a public "agency" for purposes of FOIL (see generally Perez, 5 NY3d at 528), although the converse is not necessarily true (see Citizens for Alternatives to Animal Labs, Inc. v Board of Trustees of State Univ. of New York, 92 NY2d 357, 362 [1998]). [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:04 pm
FN3 Between 1998 and 2008, Alice and Michael Kimble met with UBS representatives in New York at least six times to discuss the account. [read post]
31 Jul 2021, 11:33 am
Perez. [read post]
3 May 2018, 11:23 am
Redd, 161 F.3d 793, 795 (4th Cir.1998); United States v. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
Perez, Secretary, Department of Labor, 792 F.3d 554 (5th Cir. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
SeeRestatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, reporters notes to comment l (1998). [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
In 1958, for example, the Supreme Court in Perez v. [read post]
28 May 2008, 6:42 am
Gatson, 60 Cal.App.4th 1020, 1025-26, 70 Cal.Rptr.2d 729, 731 (1998); People v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
We don't know what this stuff means, and unless you're a doctor, chances are that you don't either.But we're pretty sure of one thing - that kind of jargon has very precise medical meaning to the people who do understand what's in these package inserts. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
While Kirtsaeng involves textbooks, one of the traditionally copyright protected works, other cases, including the two previous cases involving these provisions to reach the Supreme Court (Costco v Omega and Quality King v L’anza Research), involve consumer goods, goods that we don’t typically think of as within the subject matter of copyright. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 10:00 pm
In other words, he considered that “minimum interference” option which forms the third stage of Lord Clyde’s threefold analysis in de Freitas v Permanent Secretary of Ministry of Agriculture, Fishing, Lands and Housing (1998) had no part to play in this case. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 2:31 pm
See Stanger v. [read post]
