Search for: "People v. Peters (1982)"
Results 21 - 40
of 95
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2023, 6:30 am
Schwartz reviews the long line of cases beginning with Harlow v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 3:55 pm
People make up stories. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
Peter Stanley sued stating that he was entitled to a hearing on the subject of who would have custody of children that were his. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Apple Computer v. [read post]
1 Apr 2007, 5:02 am
Peter Bowal, Haskayne School of Business, University of Calgary, What if the stud does not function? [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 8:57 pm
Sixty-six percent of ill people were female. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
(2) Campbell v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 4:00 am
” Peter K. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
There cannot be a rule under which "poor people ... have their speech enjoined, while the rich are allowed to speak so long as they pay damages. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 9:05 am
Of the making of lists of books, there shall be no end. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 4:02 pm
Chadbourn rarely spoke about personal matters to other people. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm
Briefly, courts have adopted the learned intermediary rule because:Warnings go to physicians because they are the only people who know both a particular patient’s medical history as well as the risk/benefit profile of the drug/device being prescribed.Limiting warning duties to physicians makes the common law consistent with warning duties imposed by the FDA.Routing prescription drug/device information through the doctor preserves the physician/patient relationship from outside… [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The purpose is to show that this defendant was put in fear by these people. [read post]
5 May 2008, 4:52 pm
[v] Peter Finn, Citizen Review of Police: Approaches and Implementation, U.S. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 7:16 am
From a panel decision Bennie v. [read post]
23 May 2009, 11:26 am
Feng, Peter, Stephen D. [read post]
6 Jun 2015, 1:01 am
In 1982, law professor Peter Irons found that the Justice Department had withheld or destroyed evidence before the Korematsu case reached the Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 12:49 am
” (the answer, for most people, is likely to be “not very well”). [read post]
