Search for: "People v. Pike" Results 1 - 20 of 106
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
The court says: “SB 419 completely bans a platform where people speak, so it directly implicates speech…[and yet] SB 419 could be seen as a restriction on the time, place, or manner that a person could speak in the public forum—that is, the Internet. [read post]
19 May 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
But few people ever attempt to convert such decisions into a common currency. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am by David Kopel
Supreme Court affirmed in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
There is no need for the Supreme Court to revive the nebulous balancing tests of yesteryear, such as Pike v. [read post]
7 Sep 2022, 5:23 am by Eugene Volokh
It is widely accepted that, consistent with the Dormant Commerce Clause, a firm doing multistate business must bear the cost of discovering and complying with state laws—tort laws, tax laws, franchise laws, health laws, privacy laws, and much more—everywhere it does business.[21] People and firms operating in "real space" must take steps to learn and comply with state law in places they visit or do business, or must avoid visiting or doing business in those… [read post]
26 Aug 2022, 7:23 am by Eric Goldman
Whitepages The post Another Tough Ruling for People Search Databases–Camacho v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 12:48 pm by Daniel Shaviro
Indeed, unless a given jurisdiction has the requisite market power, it is likely to make itself worse-off on balance, not just the people in other jurisdictions, by reason of imposing them. [read post]