Search for: "People v. Pitchford"
Results 1 - 9
of 9
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2011, 9:00 am
Pitchford LJ did not pass comment and Gross LJ did not believe this important question needed to be decided in the case. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:54 am
Pitchford LJ said there was a significant danger of eliding two questions: ‘Would some of the readership have understood the publication to commit the terrorist acts? [read post]
21 May 2019, 5:23 am
English authority on the point was no different and in Harrison [2012] EWCA Civ 1736, a deportation case involving the application of Zambrano, Elias, Ward and Pitchford LJJ agreed with the Government that there is no basis for asserting that it is arguable that the Zambrano principle extends to cover anything less than a case where the EU citizen is forced to leave the territory of the EU. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 9:48 am
The Court of Appeal for England and Wales came up with a decision that was as predictable as the fact that the trial judge's ruling was going to be appealed in Starbucks (HK) Ltd & Another v British Sky Broadcasting Group Plc & Others [2013] EWCA Civ 1465. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:30 am
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 21 March 2011, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Leveson and Pitchford LJJ) will hear the appeal against the order of Eady J in Ambrosiadou v Coward ([2010] EWHC 1974 (QB)). [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:07 am
In the Courts On 12 April 2011, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Leveson and Pitchford LJJ) gave judgment in the remarkable case of Ambrosiadou v Coward ([2011] EWCA Civ 409). [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 5:02 pm
First, on 29 March 2011, there was Cook v Telegraph Media Group Ltd [2011] EWHC 763 (QB). [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Journalism and regulation The PCC has ruled on a new case: A Woman v Clevedon People, clauses 3 (privacy) and 14 (confidential sources). [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:15 am
’ Forced married is not yet criminalised in the UK and is generally regulated at civil law. [1] Yesterday, the UK Supreme Court began to hear oral arguments in Bibi v SSHD (reported at High Court and Court of Appeal as Quila v SSHD.) [read post]
