Search for: "People v. Plane" Results 81 - 100 of 626
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am by ISAAC RICHARDSON
Instead, for as long as the UK continued to be internationally responsible for a geographical territory, it would only be able to shirk its duties through actions on the international law plane. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:53 pm
James Obergefell is a plaintiff in Obergefell, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:06 pm by Kent Scheidegger
§ 32(a)(5) is designed for both the Osama bin Ladens of the world - people trying to bring down a plane, intending to cause harm - and those who are aware that their actions are dangerous and could harm others, but just don't care. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 6:46 am by Shea Denning
Yesterday, the Connecticut Supreme Court held in a 4-3 decision in State v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 12:47 pm by Elina Saxena, Quinta Jurecic
In anticipation of the upcoming G20 Summit, Turkey has arrested over 20 people with suspected connections to the Islamic State in Antalya Province. [read post]
7 Aug 2008, 3:00 pm
Both Sentencing Law & Policy and Appellate Law & Practice have good posts about Judge Posner's opinion in U.S. v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 6:30 am by Jon Gelman
”On April 24, the patient traveled by plane from Riyadh, Saudi Arabia to London, England then from London to Chicago, Illinois. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:11 am by Michael Risch
You usually see this trotted out in debates about the relative safety of air versus car travel (people remember big plane crashes, but way more people die in car accidents. [read post]
19 May 2009, 8:31 am
  So, the organizer threw in a plane ticket for the husband and baby to come, too. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 2:27 pm
” Of course, law and its operations are felt to occupy a higher plane, perhaps, where forbidden words may be uttered without harm because of the superior nature of the people involved. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:35 pm by Michael Froomkin
If I were of a snarky disposition, I’d ask a question about how today’s decision in Koontz v. [read post]