Search for: "People v. Police"
Results 1 - 20
of 13,252
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jun 2012, 4:26 pm
The 2nd District Appellate Court recently found in People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 2:02 am
Austin v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis House of Lords “Crowd control measures adopted by police in order to prevent a breach of public order, which resulted in several thousand people being confined within a police cordon for several hours, did not amount to a violation of the right to liberty if the measures were used [...] [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 4:32 pm
In People v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 5:46 pm
View the article here The People of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:59 am
In San Francisco v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 10:29 am
Cress” which lays out the elements that have to be proven (People v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 8:54 am
" The case is Arizona Broadcasters Association v. [read post]
31 May 2024, 6:07 am
HE’S AT 16TH AND V STREETS, WHERE POLICE HAVE BLOCKED THE ROADS OFF TO INVESTIGATE THAT HIT AND RUN. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 6:16 am
People v Rea: Drunk Driving Updates with Troy Michigan Expert DUIPeople v Rea: Drunk Driving Updates with Troy Michigan Expert DUIAttorneys Recently the Michigan Court of Appeals heard a case involving an individual charged with operating while intoxicated after he drove drunk on his driveway. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:34 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 12:55 pm
Good police work by Fairfield Police Officer Kevin Anderson. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 2:22 pm
People v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 3:05 pm
In People v. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
People v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 10:45 am
Pursuant to People v DeBour (40 NY2d 210) and People v Hollman (79 NY2d 181), an analysis of the lawfulness of police action for purposes of determining a suppression motion requires the court to engage in the legal equivalent of the filming of a stop action animation. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 12:14 pm
By David Worley In Zagaja v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 6:04 pm
In People v Forbes (2010 NY Slip Op 02349 [4th Dept 3/19/10] the Appellate Division, Fourth Department found that there was a violation of the well settled requirement that "police officers need either a warrant or probable cause plus exigent circumstances in order to make a lawful entry into a home" (Kirk v Louisiana, 536 US 635, 638; see Payton v New York, 445 US 573, 589-590):Where, as here, the People contend that a suspect gave… [read post]
14 May 2014, 4:53 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 7:47 am
Two decisions -- People v Battaglia (56 NY2d 558 [1982], reversing on dissent of Hancock, Jr., J. at 82 AD2d 389) and People v Hicks (68 NY2d 234 [1986]) - - have appeared to be in conflict. [read post]
