Search for: "People v. Police Court of Fresno" Results 1 - 20 of 37
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Feb 2010, 6:30 pm by Rick
”  (Tiffany A., supra, 150 Cal.App.4th at 1357, quoting the California Supreme Court case of People v. [read post]
2 Apr 2013, 11:55 am
Here's the answer.The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of Fresno decides, in a published opinion, that the answer is yes. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 3:01 am by SHG
That’s not to say that people who disagree with it cannot persist in their arguments for change, or oppose extensions beyond the right as held by the Supreme Court. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 7:46 am by Daniel Martin
The decline has been even steeper in federal district courts.Cases like Florida v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 7:13 pm by Rick
  Still, it needs to be a good one: Fresno’s police department is fond of shooting citizens, as well as dogs. [read post]
31 Oct 2019, 4:25 am by Orin S. Kerr
Next Monday, the Supreme Court will hold argument in an interesting Fourth Amendment case, Kansas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 9:28 am by Paul D. Knothe
Maryland and California’s Pitchess statutes in the wake of the California Supreme Court’s recent decision in People v. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 3:30 pm by Rick
And most people are used to being told — even that potential client had been told — not to talk to the police. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 2:19 pm by Rick
As far as things look from where I sit, police officers may very well be the only people in America who can commit crimes and still get a fair trial. [read post]