Search for: "People v. Pond" Results 1 - 20 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Dec 2010, 3:10 pm by cf
She had argued that when the previous owners - the people who owned the property before the Brosnans did - enlarged and deepened the ponds they temporarily blocked the water so that "in late 1999 and through 2000, virtually no water flowed" to her property and she thereby suffered damages to her taro crop. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
According to plaintiffs, defendants thereafter expanded an existing pond located on their property in order to create a nature preserve for passing waterfowl. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 9:43 pm by Patricia Salkin
According to plaintiffs, defendants thereafter expanded an existing pond located on their property in order to create a nature preserve for passing waterfowl. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Whatever the reason, the government has done it and now people are reading the wording of Section 59. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm by Wolfgang Demino
 In Henry v Cash Biz the Supremes had another chance to demonstrate their commitment to denying people harmed by shady business practices from getting any relief from the State’s judicial system; they embraced that opportunity wholeheartedly as much as coldheartedly, with not a single member of the court writing in dissent. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 4:30 am by Jim Dedman
Interestingly, while the CPSC has certainly dipped its toe into the social media pond, it has not established any official presence on Facebook. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 6:06 am by David Bernstein
Regardless, I think it’s going to make a splash when it does come out, at least within the specialized pond of legal academia and intellectual history. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:05 am
For those of you who may not have been following  Bloxham v. [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 12:00 am
Rocky, the Snakehead Fish, Dies of Natural Causes Maine Kills Illegal Goldfish in Outdoor Pond Herring Fishermen Join Trawler Lawsuit Lawsuit Raises Questions About Fish Oil Capsules and Health Benefits The USDA/APHIS and Live Fish Imports Rome Bans Goldfish Bowls Knox v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:09 am by Dianne Saxe
 The plaintiffs alleged that the two governments, by owning and operating these facilities between 1967 and 2000, caused or permitted the emission of contaminants on nearby people and property. [read post]