Search for: "People v. Potts"
Results 1 - 20
of 36
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2024, 10:30 am
Pott v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:32 am
On the one hand, he realized that how people perceive right and wrong can and does change from place to place and from age to age. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 5:01 am
Pott v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 9:09 am
Attorney General (a/k/a NetChoice v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:58 am
Julie Bracker, an attorney at False Claims Act Counsel who worked on the case, explained to WNN that “[p]rior to this opinion, the 10th Circuit’s decision in Potts v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
She was poised even when she was being peppered with questions from all sides of the bench, as she was in defending an ultimately unsuccessful position in her first argument, in Begay v. [read post]
16 Jan 2022, 7:02 pm
Potts(1982), 1982 CanLII 1751 (ON CA), 66 C.C.C. (2d) 219 (Ont. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 9:12 am
As you recall, earlier this year Florida passed SB 7072, a brazenly censorial #MAGA bill. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
But what makes social media platforms different is their ability to shape public discourse not by promoting their own messages but by silencing voices they deem to be harmful…. the bottleneck position that comes with control of these platforms brings with it a remarkable power to censor” By virtue of making publication decisions, every publisher necessarily “silences” the voices of people it chooses not to publish. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 6:38 pm
(Graham v. [read post]
30 Jun 2021, 7:14 pm
In other words, people who try to cloak censorial regulations as pro-free speech are actually trampling on the Constitution. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 8:01 am
Case library Amicus briefs in support of the preliminary injunction Internet Association RCFP et al EFF et al Chamber of Progress et al TechFreedom Preliminary injunction brief (if you get an error message downloading one of the files below, hit refresh) Schruers declaration Szabo declaration Veitch declaration Potts declaration Rumenap declaration Esparza declaration Pavlovic declaration Blog post on preliminary injunction brief Netchoice v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 8:21 am
Clark, 181 Fla. 521, 159 So. 881 and Potts v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 3:42 am
David A Potts is a cyberlibel and defamation barrister practising in Toronto. [read post]
10 Nov 2018, 12:27 am
State of New Mexico (10th Cir., November 8, 2018) (affirming judgment against him on his numerous claims (for disability discrimination, age discrimination, and various civil rights violations) against numerous entities and state employees) Potts v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 4:30 am
Discussions covered a variety of aspects of content moderation, including artificial intelligence v human moderation, transparency and content removal policies and appeals. [read post]
3 Oct 2015, 4:04 pm
and a revised edition entitled Potts on Cyberlibel [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 11:30 am
As the court in Potts v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 4:09 am
Commentary comes from Brian Potts at The Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Rebecca Leber in the New Republic, and Tom Donnelly at Grist. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 5:10 am
Potts complained, producing a photograph which was time- and date-stamped as evidence that he owned the copyright in the image. [read post]
