Search for: "People v. Powers (1984)"
Results 1 - 20
of 598
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2017, 1:01 am
” In 1984, Korematsu challenged the earlier decision through a writ of coram nobis in Korematsu v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am
Part 1 looked at the existing position under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
That happened with S.94 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 and, arguably, with bulk interception under RIPA. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 4:23 pm
That happened with S.94 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 and, arguably, with bulk interception under RIPA. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:55 pm
Sandvig v. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 1:40 pm
(See People v. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 12:39 pm
(Kansas City v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
I’ve recently heard some people argue that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 — which the Supreme Court applied in Hobby Lobby — violates the separation of powers. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
He began by describing modern democratic government as: “government of the people by the people for the people. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 1:22 am
He began by describing modern democratic government as: government of the people by the people for the people. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 5:16 pm
The Court noted that it had previously "construed CPL 470.15 (1) as a legislative restriction on the Appellate Division's power to review issues either decidhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gifed in an appellant's favor, or not ruled upon, by the trial court," citing People v Romero (91 NY2d 750, 753-753 [1998]) and People v Goodfriend (64 NY2d 695, 697-698 [1984]) (92 NY2d at 474). [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 6:02 am
In FDA v. [read post]
10 Jan 2024, 2:12 pm
Council (1984) decision. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 10:25 am
Cir. 1984). [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 12:01 am
Leser v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:44 am
United States v Powell, 469 US 57, 63 [1984], citing Harris v Rivera, 454 US 339, 346 [1981] [a jury has the "unreviewable power . . . to return a verdict of not guilty for impermissible reasons"]). [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 11:09 am
The Framers of the Constitution believed that the government they designed was one of limited, enumerated powers, leaving other powers to the states and the people themselves. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 8:15 am
Antulay, (1984) 2 SCC 183 (“A.R. [read post]
22 May 2022, 9:41 am
Many people therefore assume that the precedent is limited to such conditions. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
It is named after the Supreme Court’s 1984 opinion in Chevron v. [read post]
