Search for: "People v. Price"
Results 61 - 80
of 4,779
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
The criminal gang responsible for this theft sold the Buddha heads to a dealer from Chengdu at $1500, and they then sold them to a buyer from Southeast China for $18,500.[16] It often happens that the stolen work doubles or triples in price each time it is transferred to a new buyer. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:32 am
On trade secrecy and privacy issues implicated by people using large language models like ChatGPT, I found Dave Levine's essay and this HJOLT note by Amy Winograd really helpful. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
The price is too high.Now, in this particular case, I agree that the failure to provide post-seizure notice in the particular manner required by state law doesn't require suppression or invalidation of the conviction. [read post]
A Con Law Exam Featuring A Barter Ban, Discrimination Against an AroAce Couple, and Campaign Finance
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am
” His committee holds hearings at which people who lost their life savings trading cryptocurrency and NFTs testify. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 11:33 am
DeJoy and Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 5:01 am
Price, 383 U.S. 787, 800-05 (1966). [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 2:58 pm
NetChoice claims that it has an unbridled right to censor or otherwise discriminate against other peoples’ speech. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 7:48 am
Greenberg v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 5:00 am
” In 2000, another high-profile case (Waldrep v. [read post]
6 Jan 2024, 11:54 am
R v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 11:21 am
Everyone deserves to search online without police looking over their shoulder, yet millions of innocent Americans’ privacy rights are at risk in Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
SEC, 463 U.S. 646 (1983). [4] Dirks v. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm
” The “doom loop” scenario involves the following stages: “losses on the loans trigger banks to cut lending, which leads to further drops in property prices and yet more losses. [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 6:12 am
It’s a situation that echoes EFF’s founding case over 30 years ago, Steve Jackson Games v. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 8:47 pm
Smith v. [read post]
27 Dec 2023, 9:40 am
* For over a decade, I’ve implored people to stop using the term “Soft IP. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:06 am
” The mere operation of a website with later follow-up for price quotes, contract execution, and installation insufficiently establishes qualification. [read post]
25 Dec 2023, 12:03 pm
V. [read post]
