Search for: "People v. Price (1984)"
Results 61 - 80
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
Page Keeton, et al., Prosser & Keeton on the Law of Torts §96, at 686 (5th ed. 1984). [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 12:00 pm
Colo. 1984), and Werlein v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 8:51 am
Authentic prices increased after initial drops. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 2:31 am
Ghosh: Economically, reputation is information about goods/people that is not encapsulated in the price. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:46 am
The invalidation may have some serious repercussions on the ongoing Indian case ( BMS v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
Pioneer manufacturers that have long since ceased making or selling a product end up saddled with liability that can only be recouped by raising the prices of other, unrelated pioneer products. [read post]
24 Mar 2024, 9:01 pm
It promotes better price discovery. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Apple Computer v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 2:03 pm
Disabled people begin to protest the increased prices and depressed innovation. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 2:29 pm
” These words caught my eye from a scene in the movie Kramer v. [read post]
18 Nov 2014, 1:28 pm
First, the government might argue that some people find handgun advertising offensive, and do not wish to see it in public places. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 3:00 am
Few people can afford to pay an attorney for the years that a lawsuit often takes to get resolved. [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 4:31 am
Some would argue that to blame the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, but not the Supreme Court’s decision in Mistretta v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 5:01 pm
See Groupon, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2022, 2:14 am
The purpose is to show that this defendant was put in fear by these people. [read post]
13 Aug 2007, 7:32 am
Supreme Court case, Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 6:01 pm
The altruism some people would substitute for it may, when it has arrived, bring with it a higher sense of justice but it has not arrived. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 3:19 am
People v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:00 pm
In Hennig v. [read post]
