Search for: "People v. Price (1991)"
Results 61 - 80
of 191
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Aug 2017, 7:43 am
Getting less (no right to transfer, give to library) but being charged more.Value-based v. cost-based pricing. [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
, Haney v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm
First, in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:55 am
Afterward, the seller offered to sell Xerox additional property worth $5,800 for the price of only $600. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
But we did choose a name and get an office and we opened our doors in September of 1991. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am
Lower cost, lower priced, lower quality competition that substitutes for existing, expensive, quality stuff. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
(Pix © Larry Catá Backer 2017)I have just posted a preliminary draft of an article that is currently entitled The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View from International Law and Standards. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:26 am
There are several other reasons why the decision of the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers was aberrant. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am
Many people talk a good game on law and politics. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 7:00 am
The case, Rostker v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 1:31 pm
App. 1991). [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
Stinchcombe [1991] CanLII 45 (SCC), [1991] 3 SCR 326; and, R. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 11:22 am
“This is certainly the trend seen in a lot of Title VII cases as courts seem more receptive to the argument that discrimination due to sex stereotyping is prohibited by Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm
Loved the office and the people. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 5:17 am
Rural Telephone Service, 499 US 340,346 (1991). [read post]
18 May 2016, 5:40 pm
” Shepherd v. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
V. [read post]
11 Apr 2016, 6:38 am
How do you put a price on pain and suffering? [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 2:01 pm
Patel: Don't worry like I said only people with the link can view it!! [read post]