Search for: "People v. Priest" Results 21 - 40 of 333
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2011, 1:23 pm by Calvin Massey
The transcript of today's oral argument in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church v. [read post]
13 Jun 2020, 12:30 am by Karen Tani
"It is a tendency to think of black people as supporting characters in the national drama—not so much as a selfless people (on the contrary, we are often smeared as freeloaders) but as people without any real selves worth bothering about. [read post]
9 May 2013, 6:05 am
But what about the idea that people’s upbringing and experiences shape the way they turn out? [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 12:39 pm
Following the Conglomerate's excellent forum on Jones v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
Common Cause and Lamone v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:56 am by Elie Mystal
” That’s right, the Supreme Court decided the winner of a popular presidential election, and one of the architects of that decision wants people to not care about it anymore. [read post]
19 Jul 2017, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” The bill would protect people, and especially those who are not part of the faith, from discrimination in employment and in healthcare. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Matter of Sarmuksnis v Priest, 21 AD3d 381 [2005]) that the father received oral or written notice of the terms of the order of protection dated October 7, 2004 (see People v McCowan, 85 NY2d 985, 987 [1995]; see generally 1 Elkins and Fosbinder, New York Law of Domestic Violence §§ 6:33, 6:28, 6:40). [read post]
6 May 2014, 4:04 am by SHG
One of the smartest and funniest guys I know is a Catholic priest. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 3:03 pm
The Third District Appellate Court of California's Court of Appeals has just issued People v. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:06 am by Frank Cranmer
As well as being a working Labour Peer, she is also an Anglican priest. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:57 am by Eugene Volokh
Both sex and religious discrimination are, after all, prohibited by the same laws; by the City’s logic, if you call a Catholic priest “Father,” you’d have to use whatever other self-chosen religious titles people insist on. [read post]