Search for: "People v. Privitier"
Results 41 - 60
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2009, 1:34 pm
" People Exp. [read post]
7 Oct 2012, 6:40 pm
This was called the "rule of privity," and it was most famously set forth in an 1842 case Winterbottom v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 3:39 pm
Corfield v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 3:04 am
” Nicholson v. [read post]
28 Nov 2007, 8:08 pm
People v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:10 am
The IPKat has reported a few times on the attention-riveting case of Resolution v Lundbeck. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 9:29 am
The style of the case is Mendoza v. [read post]
16 Sep 2017, 5:53 pm
People change their minds. [read post]
16 Sep 2008, 8:12 pm
S.J.L.S. v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 7:00 am
At least 147 people were sickened and more than 33 people died[1]. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 10:51 am
Retroactive Application of IPRs: Security People, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 6:09 am
California v. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 7:00 am
Case citation: Norberg v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 4:15 am
The Appellate Division rejected Respondent's "factual parsing of the incident" and concluded that the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel precluded the ALJ from deciding again whether Petitioner's conduct amounted to physical abuse of the service recipient.Citing D'Arata v New York Cent. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The underlying purpose of the doctrines of res judicata and collateral estoppel is to prevent repetitious litigation of disputes which are essentially the same," citing Matter of Anonymous v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 174 AD3d 1007. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 10:12 pm
A refinement was added in 1950 in Spires v. [read post]
