Search for: "People v. Puffelis" Results 1 - 20 of 58
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2018, 1:41 pm by Peter Groves
I should not, I suppose, get too excited about what is little more than a marketing puff (Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Company [1892] EWCA Civ 1) - an attention-grabbing but legally dubious proposition. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 11:25 pm
[LBE himself brought up this point to Eli Kintisch, who once wrote a puff piece on continuations for the journal Science, but who chose to ignore the obvious disconnect between the rules and impact on backlog.] [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am by J
” (LVT Procedure (England) Regulations 2003, reg.20).Now, the LVT does not tell people this. [read post]
5 Sep 2011, 8:09 am by J
” (LVT Procedure (England) Regulations 2003, reg.20).Now, the LVT does not tell people this. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 8:39 am by Robert C. Lehrman
In a 17 page order, Judge Miller denied Tito’s motion for summary judgement in Hofmann v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 11:49 pm by Ben Reeve-Lewis
Before you huff and puff about the iniquity of it all, bear in mind that you lot (landlords) had the section 21 decision of Spencer v. [read post]
6 May 2019, 7:53 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The AFP court endorsed the latter view, saying that favorite might mean most-purchased, but it might also mean that people liked it best but couldn’t often afford it. [read post]