Search for: "People v. Ramirez" Results 41 - 60 of 240
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2014, 9:14 am
Ready v United/Goedecke Services, Inc., 232 Ill.2d 369 (2008) In Ramirez v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 4:45 pm
  With Justice Ramirez writing the majority opinion and Justice Miller dissenting.See who you agree with. [read post]
4 Feb 2021, 2:48 pm
We are expecting over 800 high school students from 34 counties to present their case (People v. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 5:14 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Defendant had the burden of establishing that he had a legitimate expectation of privacy in the hotel room that was searched by the police (see People v Ramirez-Portoreal, 88 NY2d 99, 108), and he failed to meet that burden. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 4:30 am by Michael C. Dorf
In a case on the plenary docket, Ramirez v. [read post]
10 Mar 2021, 10:15 am by Karen Gullo
In the case, TransUnion misidentified plaintiff Sergio Ramirez and over 8,000 other people as included on the U.S. terrorist list. [read post]
12 Oct 2013, 11:10 am
In the case at bar, the Family Court's determination that the child's best interests would be served by awarding sole custody to the father has a sound and substantial basis in the record as was held in analogous cases of Matter of Peoples v Bideau, Pierre–Paul v Boursiquot, Matter of Ramirez v Velez and Matter of Paul v Sawyer. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 8:20 pm by Donald Thompson
 Likewise, the circumstances of some shootings, by their nature, can establish the defendant’s intent to cause serious physical injury (see, People v Vigliotti, 270 AD2d 904 [4th Dept 2000] [victim shot in chest from two feet or less during argument with defendant; proof sufficient to establish intent to cause serious physical injury]; People v Ramirez, 182 AD2d 569 [1st Dept 1992] [same]; People v Dukes, 30 AD3d 682 [3rd Dept… [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 12:00 am by Orin Kerr
The police encountered twelve people at the home, but Bowen was not among them. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:05 pm by Kym Stapleton
"  The California Supreme Court disagreed with Soto and held on Monday in People v. [read post]