Search for: "People v. Ray (1996)" Results 1 - 20 of 57
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2014, 10:44 am by Stephen Bilkis
Although the defendant apparently urges that SORA classification procedures violate procedural due process, the New York Court of Appeals recently analyzed a claim with some similarity to the one here under the substantive due process doctrine in People v Knox. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 12:22 pm by Kevin
The second is a little more straightforward: Ray Miles v. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 10:03 am
Chiles, 680 So. 2d 400, 407 (Fla. 1996), for the proposition that the amended complaint raises only nonjusticiable “political” questions, see Baker v. [read post]
11 Feb 2019, 6:04 am by MBettman
Klima, 934 S.W.2d 109 (Tex.Cr.App.1996) (When the state raises standing for the first time on appeal, it is not “rais[ing] a new issue. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 1:05 pm by Dani Selby
  Unfortunately, Ray had few clients due to prejudice against both Black people and women, and was eventually forced to close her practice. [read post]